AI Adoption and Corporate Governance: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices

A modern corporate boardroom featuring a wooden conference table with gray upholstered chairs, a wall-mounted flat-screen display, glass partition walls, linear ceiling lights, and an orange-toned floor.
Image Credit: Photo by myHQ-Workspaces on Pexels (SourceLicense)

AI Summary of Scholarly Research

This page presents an AI-generated summary of a published research paper. The original authors did not write or review this article. See full disclosure ↓

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)·2026-02-28·View original paper ↗·Follow this topic (RSS)
Publication Signals show what we were able to verify about where this research was published.STANDARDAvailable publication signals for this source were verified. Publication Signals reflect the source’s verifiable credentials, not the quality of the research.

Fewer signals were independently confirmable for this source. That reflects the limits of what’s on record — not a judgment about the research.

  • ✔ No retraction or integrity flags
  • ✔ Journal impact data available (H-index: 204)

Overview

This research investigates the intersection of artificial intelligence adoption and corporate governance structures, examining how boards and governance frameworks must adapt to oversee AI-driven decision-making processes. The study positions AI governance as a strategic imperative rather than solely a technical concern, affecting risk management, regulatory compliance, stakeholder trust, and organizational sustainability. Through analysis of existing corporate governance models and emerging AI regulatory frameworks, the research identifies critical deficiencies in board-level expertise, policy development, and monitoring capabilities. A conceptual model is proposed that incorporates AI risk assessment, ethical guidelines, transparency mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement within corporate governance architectures. The work addresses the necessity for accountability mechanisms and oversight structures capable of managing both the innovation potential and inherent risks associated with AI system integration in corporate operations.

Methods and approach

The research employs a qualitative methodology combining multiple investigative approaches. A comprehensive literature review examines current corporate governance models and emerging regulatory frameworks specific to AI technology. Case analysis of leading corporations that have implemented AI governance frameworks provides empirical insights into practical applications and organizational adaptations. Expert interviews with board members and technology officers capture perspectives from key decision-makers responsible for AI oversight and strategic implementation. This triangulated approach enables examination of AI governance from both theoretical and applied perspectives, generating insights across policy, operational, and strategic dimensions of corporate technological oversight.

Key Findings

The investigation reveals that effective AI governance requires a multi-dimensional framework integrating board-level strategic oversight, robust internal control systems, and continuous ethical evaluation of AI applications. Critical gaps were identified in board expertise regarding AI technologies, inadequate policy formulation processes, and insufficient monitoring mechanisms for AI system performance and impacts. The findings demonstrate that successful AI governance cannot be achieved through isolated technical solutions but necessitates comprehensive organizational adaptation. The proposed conceptual model establishes integration points for risk assessment protocols, ethical evaluation frameworks, transparency requirements, and stakeholder engagement mechanisms within existing corporate governance structures. Evidence from case analyses and expert interviews indicates that organizations with specialized oversight mechanisms and director-level AI literacy demonstrate more effective governance outcomes.

Implications

The research provides actionable recommendations for corporate boards seeking to enhance technological governance capabilities. Key recommendations include implementing director training programs focused on AI technology and its organizational implications, establishing specialized AI committees with appropriate technical and ethical expertise, and aligning governance practices with emerging regulatory standards. The findings suggest that boards must actively develop AI literacy and oversight competencies rather than delegating these responsibilities exclusively to technical personnel. The proposed framework contributes to evolving discourse on responsible technological adoption by establishing connections between traditional corporate governance principles and AI-specific oversight requirements. Organizations face strategic imperatives to integrate AI governance into broader risk management, compliance, and sustainability frameworks to maintain stakeholder trust and ensure long-term viability in increasingly AI-dependent operational environments.

Disclosure

  • Research title: AI Adoption and Corporate Governance: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices
  • Authors: Vishal S. Khot
  • Publication date: 2026-02-28
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18708428
  • OpenAlex record: View
  • Image credit: Photo by myHQ-Workspaces on Pexels (SourceLicense)
  • Disclosure: This post was generated by Claude (Anthropic). The original authors did not write or review this post.

Get the weekly research newsletter

Stay current with peer-reviewed research without reading academic papers — one filtered digest, every Friday.

More posts